• Home
  • About
  • Content categories
  • Masterlist

DSG – in the pipeline

~ Dennis' latest work assembled here

DSG – in the pipeline

Tag Archives: sale

Capital Gains Tax

20 Monday Sep 2021

Posted by Ursula in Posts

≈ Comments Off on Capital Gains Tax

Tags

CGT, portugal, property, sale, tax

Options when selling Property in an Offshore Company

Many owners of Offshore Companies, both black and white listed, reach a point where, for any number of reasons, they wish to sell up. Yet most are uncertain of the Capital Gains Tax consequences of such a sale, particularly since there are a number of different ways to structure the transaction. While individual proceedings sometimes present unique circumstances, the following example should prove illustrative of most sales. Respective costs and savings ought to be proportional in most cases.

The Situation:   Non-Resident Owners selling a property held in an Offshore Company

1)   An Offshore Company purchases a property in Portugal for €200,000 (inflation-adjusted price).

      At this point, both the Property and the Company are worth €200,000.

2)   A Non-Resident couple buys the shares of the Company for €300,000.

While the Company has a share value of €300,000, the book value of the Property remains €200,000.

3)   The Company moves its headquarters and effective management (redomiciliation) from Gibraltar to Delaware. No change in respective values is registered.

4)   The Owners wish to sell the Property/Company for €550,000.  This can be done in one of three ways:

a)   the Company sells the Property directly to the Buyers; or

b)   the Owners of the Delaware Company sell their shares to the Buyers; or

c)   the Delaware Company is first moved to Portugal, then Owners of the Portuguese Nominee Company sell their shares to the Buyers.

The Tax Consequences for Buyer and Seller:

a) The Company sells its Property:

The Capital Gain on the sale of the Property is the net difference between purchase price (€200,000) and the sales price (€550,000) minus capital improvements in the previous 12 years minus deductible buying and selling costs. The net gain is then taxed at the rate of 25%.

Example – the final result might look something like this:

€550,000 (sale) – €200,000 (purchase) – €15,000 (improvements) – €5,000 (expenses) =

€230,000 (net gain) X 25% (non-resident tax rate on sale of property) = €57,500 (CGT)

The buyer will also pay the following acquisition taxes:

€33,000 (IMT) + €4,400 (Stamp Duty) = €37,400 (acquisition taxes)

Option nº 1

Seller is taxed €57,500 – Buyer is taxed €37,400

Since it is a Delaware Company that is selling the Property, then the taxable Gain will be to the Company. However, it is more than likely that the distribution of these profits to the shareholders will also incur an assessment to Owners in the home jurisdiction on these “dividends”. 

b)   Sale of the Shares of the Delaware Company

The shares of the Delaware Company are sold to the Buyer.  In accordance with the USA-Portugal Tax Treaty (Article 14), this transaction is treated as a Sale of Property Rights since the US Company, as a resident entity under the Treaty, consisting of more then 50% of immovable property located in Portugal. Therefore, the Gain may be taxed in Portugal in an identical fashion as above

Optionº 2

Seller is taxed €57,500 – Buyer pays no tax

with a net CGT due of €57,500. Since the Sellers are non-residents in Portugal, they will also be taxable on the worldwide income in their home jurisdiction. In this instance, the transaction will no longer be seen as a property rights transfer but merely as a sale of shares (movable assets). After application of any Capital Gains allowances, a second CGT assessment will be due on this gain. Given the deemed natures of the perceived transaction, together with the triangulation of the jurisdictions involved, there is no way to eliminate double taxation.

Option nº 3:   Sale of Portuguese Nominee Company

When the Portuguese Company is sold, the Gain is calculated as follows:

First, the Delaware Company must move to Portugal.  As part of this Redomiciliation, an appraisal is performed of the Property, determining that the Company’s sole asset is valued at €530,000. 

Therefore, at the time of the move to Portugal, the Company is worth €530,000 and the now Portuguese Company’s shares reflect this value.

The Shares are then sold as follows:

€550,000 (sales price of shares) – €530,000 (value of shares upon Redomiciliation to Portugal)  =

€20,000 X 10% (tax rates on sale of shares)  =  €2,000 (CGT)

           The buyers will also pay €25 (Stamp Duty on Share Transfer Deed)                                             

Optionº 3:

Seller is taxed  €2,000 – Buyer is taxed  €25

As the Sellers are Non-Resident, they may also be liable for CGT in their home jurisdiction. In this case, the tax paid in Portugal will normally serve as an international tax credit, reducing or eliminating any eventual CGT assessment. Needless to say, while the rate may be different, the basis should be the same.

Conclusion:

As you can see, there is considerable difference both for Buyers and Sellers when redomiciling to Portugal. By selling the Portuguese Nominee Company, rather than the Company selling the Property or the shares of the Delaware Company, both sellers and buyers save appreciably.  In comparison, the costs of Redomiciliation and the subsequent share transfer should prove only a minor inconvenience.

In addition, due to Portuguese fiscal transparency rules, owners of Nominee Companies are free from any possible double taxation in Portugal since liability for potentially chargeable events is transposed out of the Company directly to the Shareholders and is never be assessed to both.

Housing sales rise in suburbs but rentals decline

27 Monday Feb 2017

Posted by Ursula in Posts

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

decline, housing, letting, rental, sale, suburbs

There are more houses being sold today but high prices in central urban areas are pushing buyers out to the suburbs. Simultaneously, rentals are in decline. Letting accounted for 60% of real estate activity at the height of the crisis but has fallen sharply in the last two years. In 2016, lets accounted for just 25% of housing turnovers.

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • September 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016

Categories

  • Article
  • Articles
  • Briefs
  • Brochure
  • Posts
  • Shorts
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • DSG - in the pipeline
    • Join 74 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • DSG - in the pipeline
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar